Is a revolution in military affairs (RMA) achievable at the turn of the twenty-first century, and if so, does it necessitate a radical change in U.S. military equipment, combat structures, and warfighting doctrine? Or can the United States continue to make security policy and arrange Pentagon budgetary priorities in a more continuous and evolutionary way? In Technological Change and the future of Warfare, Michael O’Hanlon describes the RMA hypothesis now ...
